Documents plunge Australian Cardinal George Pell into further controversy over child abuse response.

Join us on Facebook:

New documents have revealed a conflict of interest between Cardinal George Pell and the experts he appointed to investigate child sexual abuse allegations in the church.

Cardinal Pell has claimed his discredited “Melbourne Response” to abuse within the church was a world-first in assisting and compensating victims – however he faces allegations the church sought to protect pedophile priests.

Never-before-published documents shown on 60 Minutes tonight suggest the response was not in fact “independent” and “compassionate”, but a smokescreen designed to protect the church at all costs.

As part of an investigation into claims of sexual abuse perpetrated by school priest Kevin O’Donnell at the Sacred Heart Primary School in Ballarat, Cardinel Pell named psychiatrist Richard Ball a key appointee.

Mr Ball, whose duty was to assess and treat victims of child abuse such as sisters Emma and Katie Foster, also happened to be the go-to expert witness used by lawyers to defend pedophile priests, including the very same priest who raped the Foster sisters, Kevin O’Donnell.


Commissioner Peter Saunders commends the Fosters’ 19 year long “courageous” fight for justice.

“No victim would want to talk to him,” Emma and Katie’s father, Anthony Foster told reporter Tara Brown.

“Any victim who is sitting in front of a psychiatrist who also had that victim’s perpetrator as a client would be horrified by that.”

In a secret letter to O’Donnell’s lawyer, Mr Ball states he was fully versed with O’Donnell’s background and the nature of his offences.

However in a second letter written on the same day to the sentencing judge, Mr Ball directly contradicted his secret letter.

“I have had insufficient time to carry out a formal and detailed assessment,” he wrote.

Mr Ball also failed to inform the judge that O’Donnell had admitted to offending recently. The sentencing transcripts confirm the judge relied upon this evidence when sentencing O’Donnell.

“It is of great significance in your favour that you have not offended against the law over those past eighteen years,” the judge said.

O’Donnell could have faced 86 years in jail, but was instead sentenced to three years and nine months, only two of which were served.

He died in 1997 a free man.

Cardinal Pell’s other main appointee on the “Melbourne Response” was Victorian QC Peter O’Callaghan, whose job was to assess if claims of abuse had taken place.

Like Mr Ball, Commissioner O’Callaghan was meant to be independent of the church, however evidence suggests they were instructed by and reported to the church’s longstanding law firm, represented by Richard Leder.

Correspondence between Mr Ball and Commissioner O’Collaghan suggests clear potential for conflict of interest, with Ball referring in one letter to victim Emma Foster as potentially costing “millions”.

Peter Saunders, an abuse survivor appointed by the Pope to sit on Vatican’s child abuse commission, has condemned the church’s failure to protect and assist victims.

“The vilest crime on the planet is the assault, the rape of a child,” he said.

“A very close second is to witness it and to do nothing.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s